Visuais Para Tecnologia Emancipatória: Um Estudo de Caso Sobre a Cocriação de uma Linguagem Visual Para Combater a Violência de Género Online no Twitter Indiano
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/vista.4133Palavras-chave:
design visual, plugin do Twitter, violência de género online, tecnologia feminista, design interdisciplinarResumo
Este ensaio é um relato da criação visual do Uli, um plugin, centrado no utilizador, para o browser, destinado a detetar e moderar a violência de género online no Twitter. Os autores deste ensaio, que participaram como designers visuais na equipa que desenvolveu o Uli, discutem o processo de cocriação subjacente à conceção da narrativa visual de tal ferramenta para representar o trabalho coletivo na sua criação por jornalistas, ativistas, influenciadores, escritores, tecnólogos e investigadores empenhados na luta contra a violência baseada na casta, religião, género e sexualidade, tanto online como offline. Por fim, o ensaio lança luz sobre a forma como essa identidade visual e narrativa podem promover uma cultura visual alternativa que desafia a linguagem visual dominante das redes sociais, que é complacente na propagação da violência de género online.
Downloads
Referências
Budhwar, Y. (2022). Responsible way of showcasing the countering of OGBV. Uli. https://uli.tattle.co.in/blog/responsible-display/
Chandrashekhar, M. (2015, June 30). Stunningly beautiful Kantha embroidery work of Bengal, India on bedcovers & quilts. The Cultural Heritage of India. https://cultureandheritage.org/2015/06/stunningly-beautiful-kantha-embroidery.html
Delhi Crafts Council. (n.d.). Chamba Rumal. http://www.delhicraftscouncil.org/projects/2016/6/2/chamba-rumaal
Facebook. (2019, September 23). People often ask us how we decide what content is and isn't allowed on Facebook. The answer is our Community Standards [Image attached] [Status update]. Facebook. https://m.facebook.com/facebookappIndia/posts/people-often-ask-us-how-we-decide-what-content-is-and-isnt-allowed-on-facebook-t/2490127257690847/
Gabert-Doyon, J. (2021, January 24). Why does every advert look the same? Blame Corporate Memphis. Wired UK. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/corporate-memphis-design-tech
Johnston, A. (2022, August 11). The Digital Closet tells the story of how the internet became straight. Eye on Design. https://eyeondesign.aiga.org/the-digital-closet-tells-the-story-of-how-the-internet-became-straight/
Jose, J. (2021, July 13). The politicization of social media in India. South Asian Voices. https://southasianvoices.org/the-politicization-of-social-media-in-india/
Monea, A. (2022). The digital closet: How the internet became straight. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12551.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12551.001.0001
Morris, J. (2011, January 8). Two pieces. Drawing a Line in Time. http://drawingalineintime.blogspot.com/2011/01/two-pieces.html
Pandey, G. (2021, July 9). Sulli Deals: The Indian Muslim women "up for sale" on an app. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-57764271
PTI. (2022, January 11). "Misogynistic, abusive": Editors' guild demands SC probe into Tek Fog app. The News Minute. https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/misogynistic-abusive-editors-guild-demands-sc-probe-tek-fog-app-159735
Rana Ayyub [@RanaAyyub]. (2022a, January 24). 26.4 thousand tweets, most are abusive, rape and death threats, calling me a terror sympathiser. Most tweets are by the [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/ranaayyub/status/1485728200890413056
Rana Ayyub [@RanaAyyub]. (2022b, November 14). Frustration is not the right term for this [Image attached] [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/RanaAyyub/status/1591994568983171073
Suzor, N., Dragiewicz, M., Harris, B., Gillett, R., Burgess, J., & Van Geelen, T. (2018). Human rights by design: The responsibilities of social media platforms to address gender-based violence online. Policy & Internet, 11(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.185
Twitter [@Twitter]. (2022, December 10). we’re relaunching @TwitterBlue on Monday – subscribe on web for $8/month or on iOS for $11/month to get access to subscriber-only features, including the blue checkmark [Image attached] [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/Twitter/status/1601692766257709056
Uli. (2022a). Abou Uli. https://uli.tattle.co.in/about/
Uli. (2022b). This post is adapted from the Uli newsletter updates sent in March and April 2022. https://uli.tattle.co.in/blog/making-of-mar-2022
Vidgen, B., & Derczynski, L. (2020). Directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: Garbage in, garbage out. PLOS ONE, 15(12), e0243300. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243300
Waseem, Z. (2016). Are you a racist or am I seeing things? Annotator influence on hate speech detection on twitter. In D. Bamman, A. Dogruöz, J. Eisenstein, D. Hovy, D. Jurgens, B. O’Connor, A. Oh, O. Tsur, & S. Volkova (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science (pp. 138–142). ACLWeb; Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W16-5618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W16-5618
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Twisha Mehta, Shagnik Chakraborty
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
Os autores são titulares dos direitos de autor, concedendo à revista o direito de primeira publicação. O trabalho é licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.