Review Forms
Vista has two review forms depending on the type of work.
Review form (articles)
- The overall quality of the article is: *
 
- Outstanding (must be published)
 
- Very good (must be published)
 - Suitable
 - Unsuitable
 
- The article requires revision: *
 
- Minor
 
- Considerable
 - Major
 
- The relevance of the article to the scope of the journal is: *
 
- Excellent
 - Very good
 
- Good
 - Suitable
 - Poor
 - Very poor
 
- For its originality and theoretical and empirical or both contributions to the field of Visual Culture, this article is: *
 
- Excellent
 - Very good
 - Good
 - Suitable
 - Poor
 
- Very poor
 
- The article's description of the reasons behind the research, including its relevance for the field of Visual Culture, is: *
 
- Excellent
 - Very good
 - Good
 
- Suitable
 - Poor
 - Very poor
 
- In light of its coherence, clarity, and relevance to the subject explored, the theoretical grounding of this article is: *
 
- Excellent
 
- Very good
 - Good
 - Suitable
 - Poor
 - Very poor
 
- The methodological approaches in this article are: *
 
- Excellent
 - Very good
 - Good
 - Suitable
 
- Poor
 - Very poor
 
- On clarity and consistency, the conclusions drawn are: *
 
- Excellent
 - Very good
 
- Good
 - Suitable
 - Poor
 - Very poor
 
- As for the academic style, journal citation standards, title, and abstract appropriateness, this article is: *
 
- Excellent
 - Very good
 - Good
 - Suitable
 - Poor
 
- Very poor
 
- The presentation, organisation, and writing of the article are: *
 
- Excellent
 - Very good
 - Good
 
- Suitable
 - Poor
 - Very poor
 
Detailed review for the authors*
Please substantiate your scores. This review will be sent to the authors.
Comments for editors
(Confidential)
Review form (reviews, interviews and visual projects)
- The overall quality of the work is: *
 
- Outstanding (must be published)
 
- Very good (must be published)
 - Suitable
 - Unsuitable
 
- The work needs a review: *
 
- Minor
 
- Considerable
 - Major
 
- The relationship of the work to the theme of the journal is: *
 
- Excellent
 - Very good
 
- Good
 - Suitable
 - Poor
 - Very poor
 
Detailed review for the authors*
Please substantiate your scores. This review will be sent to the authors.
Comments for editors
(Confidential)
						


